首页> 外文OA文献 >Redressing or entrenching social and health inequities through policy implementation? Examining personalised budgets through the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme
【2h】

Redressing or entrenching social and health inequities through policy implementation? Examining personalised budgets through the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme

机译:通过政策实施纠正或加剧社会和卫生方面的不公平现象?通过澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划审查个性化预算

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Increasing attention is being given to political agenda setting for the social determinants of health. While designing policies that can improve the social determinants of health is critical, so too is ensuring these policies are appropriately administered and implemented. Many policies have the potential to entrench or even expand inequities during implementation. At present little attention has been given to this in the social determinants of health literature. There is an international trend in the personalisation of funding for care services, from the National Health Service in the England to the Brukerstyrt Personlig Assistanse in Norway. Part of this trend is the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). The NDIS has the potential to secure gains in health for hundreds of thousands of Australians living with a disability. However, policies are only as good as their implementation. METHODS: As part of a longitudinal study on the implementation of the Australian NDIS, we conducted a systematic document search of policy documents pertaining to the Scheme on the websites of government departments with auspice over the design and implementation of the scheme with the aim of examining issues of equity. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Scheme architects have argued that the NDIS has the potential to replace a piecemeal and fragmented set of state-determined services with an empowering model of user choice and control. However, without careful attention to both existing inequities and, diversity and difference across populations (e.g. different disability types and different localities), market based approaches such as the NDIS have the serious potential to entrench or even widen inequities. CONCLUSIONS: The research concluded that 'personalisation' approaches can widen inequities and inequalities unless careful consideration is given at both policy design and implementation stages.
机译:背景:人们越来越关注健康的社会决定因素的政治议程设定。尽管设计可以改善健康的社会决定因素的政策至关重要,但确保适当地管理和实施这些政策也很重要。在执行过程中,许多政策都有可能加剧甚至扩大不平等现象。目前,在健康文献的社会决定因素中对此很少关注。从英国的国家卫生服务部到挪威的布鲁克人私人身份协助中心,护理服务的资金个性化存在国际趋势。这种趋势的一部分是澳大利亚国家残疾人保险计划(NDIS)。 NDIS有潜力确保成千上万的澳大利亚残疾人获得健康。但是,政策仅与其执行一样好。方法:作为对澳大利亚NDIS实施情况的纵向研究的一部分,我们在政府部门的网站上对与该计划有关的政策文件进行了系统的文件搜索,重点是该计划的设计和实施。公平问题。结果与讨论:方案架构师认为NDIS可以用授权的用户选择和控制模型来代替零碎和零散的状态确定服务集。但是,如果不仔细关注既有的不平等现象以及人口的多样性和差异(例如,不同的残疾类型和不同的地区),则基于市场的方法(如NDIS)就具有加剧甚至扩大不平等现象的严重潜力。结论:该研究得出结论,除非在政策设计和实施阶段都认真考虑,否则“个人化”方法会扩大不平等和不平等现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号